SEATTLE, WASHINGTON / THE PACIFIC NORTHWESTINDEPENDENT VOICE. LOCAL PERSPECTIVE.
THE TEAMS WE FOLLOW.
THE CITY WE CALL HOME.
Rain City Sports.THE SEATTLE EDITION ↗
← BACK TO THE SEATTLE EDITIONCollege / Recap

Portland’s fast second-half double leaves Seattle U chasing in 3–0 loss

The Redhawks reach halftime level, then concede twice in 132 seconds. Saturday’s trip to San Francisco brings the next chance to stop a three-match slide.

RAIN CITY SPORTS · Published 2026-10-22 · Updated 2026-10-22
Illustrative stock photo, not a photograph of this event
Stock photograph / Unsplash. Illustrative; does not depict the reported event.

Rain City Sports editorial desk | October 22, 2026 | Match played October 21.

A level match breaks open

Seattle University lost 3–0 to No. 21 Portland at Championship Field on Wednesday, with all three goals arriving after halftime. The Redhawks fell to 4–6–3 overall and 1–2–2 in the West Coast Conference. Portland improved to 8–3–2 and 5–0–0 in league play.

The score was still 0–0 at the interval, but that position disappeared almost immediately after the restart. Joe Highfield scored at 46:58, and David Ajagbe added a second at 49:10. In two minutes and 12 seconds, Seattle U went from holding the conference leader level to needing a two-goal recovery.

The deciding moments

The WCC’s official box score credits Diego Rosas with the assist on Highfield’s opener, then Rosas and Isaac Emojong on Ajagbe’s first goal. Ajagbe scored again at 64:53, assisted by Highfield, to complete the scoring. The record identifies the decisive sequence clearly; it does not establish a single tactical cause for each breakdown.

Seattle U produced more attempts after halftime, matching Portland’s eight second-half shots. Nico Wiskel supplied both Redhawk shots on target, while Alex Notzka had three attempts. Goalkeeper Aleksander Kapciak made three saves. The Pilots finished with a 16–9 shot advantage and six shots on goal to Seattle U’s two.

Where the Redhawks stand

Seattle U’s athletics recap identifies the result as its first home defeat of the season and a second successive conference loss. The schedule also records the preceding nonconference defeat at Washington, making this three straight losses overall. The distinction matters: the entire slide counts toward form, but only two of those matches affected the WCC record.

The buildup had presented this as a meeting of the league’s leading attacks. Seattle U’s October 20 preview listed 27 goals for the Redhawks and 28 for Portland. That background makes another scoreless outing a meaningful concern, even while the opponent’s unbeaten conference record explains the difficulty of the assignment.

Notzka entered the match with 10 goals, having reached double figures against Washington. Freshman Leo Flores had five goals and two assists in the school’s preview. Analysis: Seattle U has established attacking contributors to build around; the immediate task is to create opportunities that bring those strengths into games against stronger opposition.

What needs to improve

Analysis: the priority is managing the first minutes after halftime. Reaching the break level preserved an opportunity to earn a result. Conceding twice before the 50th minute changed the demands on the attack and left little room for another defensive error. Preventing a first setback from becoming an immediate second is a practical starting point.

Analysis: the offensive response also needs a better return. More second-half attempts showed activity, but two efforts on target across the match left Portland’s goalkeeper with limited work. Shot selection and the quality of the final pass deserve attention alongside the volume of attacks; the box score alone cannot say which adjustment will solve that problem.

The documented view and the next test

Seattle U’s official account emphasizes the scoreless first half, improved second-half shot production and the opportunity to respond on the road. Those are the program’s documented reference points. They support a measured assessment: there was a platform at halftime, but the performance after the restart did not protect it.

The Redhawks visit San Francisco on Saturday, October 24, with kickoff listed for 7 p.m. Pacific. Analysis: a stronger opening to each half and more sustained threat on goal would offer firmer evidence of progress than possession or shot totals in isolation. The next match is an opportunity to change the recent pattern; Wednesday’s result supplies no guarantee of a rebound.

Sources

Analysis and recommendations are the editorial desk’s interpretation. Reporting and attributed perspectives are linked above. Information is current as of the publication date.

← MORE SEATTLE STORIES